Like we talked about in class,
defining, understanding, and memorizing Kant’s terminology is an integral part
of even beginning to understand his philosophy. While reading the introduction,
I thought I had a decent grasp on what a
priori judgments are, but actually coming up with examples of knowledge that fits the
description a priori is not an easy
task. There were two examples in the introduction that made my understanding a
bit clearer. The first regards mathematics: “Mathematics gives us a shining
example of how far, independently of experience, we can progress in a priori knowledge. It does, indeed, occupy itself with objects
and with knowledge solely in so far as they allow of being exhibited in
intuition” (46-47). This explanation and its inclusion of intuition sheds some
light on how a priori knowledge can
exist and what it entails. I can have an intuition without any experience, and
it is still a real and tangible judgment.
Also, in that same paragraph, Kant
articulates a fault in Plato’s philosophy that made me understand a priori a little better. He states: “It
was thus that Plato left the world of the senses, as setting too narrow limits
to the understanding, and ventured out beyond it on the wings of the ideas, in
the empty space of the pure understanding. He did not observe that with all his
efforts he made no advance—meeting no resistance that might, as it were, serve
as a support upon which he could take a stand” (47). This made me think of
Plato’s forms and whether or not they are known a priori. In a sense, they are
separate from experience. However, one must study and contemplate the forms and
go through education and training to reach a real understanding of the forms,
which sounds like experience to me. I’m not sure if a priori can even be applied to abstract, metaphysical subjects
like this, and if so, how. Either way, it seems that Kant is criticizing Plato’s
venture into the “empty space of the pure understanding.” I’m sure that as we analyze
Kant more and consider different examples, the particularities of a priori will become more clear.
No comments:
Post a Comment